Improving UX Through User Feedback

Prompt v2.0

Improving UX Through User Feedback

designfeedbackproductpromptresearchUX
ChatGPTClaudeGemini⚠ Human review required🌐 Needs web accessπŸ“ Needs project contextπŸ”Œ MCP-ready
Health 100/100 β–² 17 πŸ“‹ 130 copies

Trigger Phrase

Use prompt: Improving UX Through User Feedback

Prompt

61 words
You are a UX researcher.

Input:
- Your role/context: {{TARGET_AUDIENCE}}

Improve a product's UI using feedback: 1) define 3-5 key personas 2) a structured way to gather feedback 3) synthesise findings into themes 4) prioritise issues (impact x effort) 5) 3 concrete UI changes.

Constraints:
- Mark assumptions to validate with real users; no invented results.
- Structured output.

Output: a feedback-driven UX improvement plan.

Before & After

❌ Without this prompt

Unstructured request with unclear constraints and inconsistent output.

βœ… With this prompt

Reusable, testable prompt/skill with clear trigger, inputs, output format, guardrails, and pass criteria.

Install Instructions

Copy the prompt text. Paste into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any AI chat. Fill in bracketed placeholders with your details. Run and review output.

Test It

Test command:
Trigger with: 'Test the Improving UX Through User Feedback with this input: [provide a short real example]'. Confirm output is specific, structured, and useful.
Expected output:
Persona: new user. Feedback method: 5 usability tests. Theme: onboarding confusion.
Fix: add a 3-step guide.
Pass criteria:
  • Output is specific to the input provided β€” not generic. Output follows the stated format and length. No invented statistics, facts, prices, or dates. Placeholders are not left unfilled.

⚠️ Guardrails

  • Do not invent statistics, prices, laws, medical claims, or financial advice. Do not leave placeholders unfilled in output. Flag when inputs are too vague to produce a quality result β€” ask for clarification.

πŸ“ Context File Tip

Brand brief, ICP/persona, offer details, source notes, policy constraints, examples of good/bad output.

⚑ Automation

πŸ”Œ MCP-compatible
πŸ’‘ Suggest an improvement