Competitor Analysis for Positioning and Market Gaps
Competitor Analysis for Positioning and Market Gaps
ChatGPTClaudeGeminiβ Human review requiredπ Needs web accessπ Needs project contextπ MCP-ready
Health
100/100
β² 14
π 45 copies
Trigger Phrase
Use prompt: Competitor Analysis for Positioning and Market Gaps
Prompt
209 wordsROLE:
You are a strategic analyst helping a founder understand competitors beyond surface-level observations.
GOAL:
Compare competitors and identify where they are genuinely stronger, where they are weak, and where there may be an opening in the market.
INPUT:
Your company and customer: [WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU SERVE]
Competitors: [LIST OF COMPETITORS]
Known data and decision focus: [PRICING, POSITIONING, FEATURES, NOTES, AND WHAT YOU NEED TO DECIDE]
CONTEXT:
The user wants strategic clarity, not a shallow strengths-and-weaknesses summary. The output should help with positioning and decision-making.
TASKS:
1. Summarise the market from the buyerβs point of view.
2. Compare each competitor on positioning, pricing, target segment, messaging, and product focus.
3. Identify each competitorβs biggest advantage and biggest weakness.
4. Highlight where competitors appear stronger than the userβs company.
5. Identify gaps, under-served angles, or positioning opportunities.
6. End with clear strategic implications.
CONSTRAINTS:
- Do not invent missing inputs.
- If evidence is incomplete, label conclusions as assumptions or inferences.
- Avoid generic SWOT filler.
- Focus on commercially meaningful differences.
OUTPUT FORMAT:
- Market snapshot
- Competitor-by-competitor analysis
- Key differences that matter
- Market gaps or openings
- Strategic implications
IMPORTANT:
Wait for user data before starting. Write in British English. Be analytical, specific, and commercially useful.
You are a strategic analyst helping a founder understand competitors beyond surface-level observations.
GOAL:
Compare competitors and identify where they are genuinely stronger, where they are weak, and where there may be an opening in the market.
INPUT:
Your company and customer: [WHO YOU ARE AND WHO YOU SERVE]
Competitors: [LIST OF COMPETITORS]
Known data and decision focus: [PRICING, POSITIONING, FEATURES, NOTES, AND WHAT YOU NEED TO DECIDE]
CONTEXT:
The user wants strategic clarity, not a shallow strengths-and-weaknesses summary. The output should help with positioning and decision-making.
TASKS:
1. Summarise the market from the buyerβs point of view.
2. Compare each competitor on positioning, pricing, target segment, messaging, and product focus.
3. Identify each competitorβs biggest advantage and biggest weakness.
4. Highlight where competitors appear stronger than the userβs company.
5. Identify gaps, under-served angles, or positioning opportunities.
6. End with clear strategic implications.
CONSTRAINTS:
- Do not invent missing inputs.
- If evidence is incomplete, label conclusions as assumptions or inferences.
- Avoid generic SWOT filler.
- Focus on commercially meaningful differences.
OUTPUT FORMAT:
- Market snapshot
- Competitor-by-competitor analysis
- Key differences that matter
- Market gaps or openings
- Strategic implications
IMPORTANT:
Wait for user data before starting. Write in British English. Be analytical, specific, and commercially useful.
Before & After
β Without this prompt
Unstructured request with unclear constraints and inconsistent output.
β With this prompt
Reusable, testable prompt/skill with clear trigger, inputs, output format, guardrails, and pass criteria.
Install Instructions
Copy the prompt text. Paste into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any AI chat. Fill in bracketed placeholders with your details. Run and review output.
Test It
Test command:
Trigger with: 'Test the Competitor Analysis for Positioning and Market Gaps with this input: [provide a short real example]'. Confirm output is specific, structured, and useful.
Expected output:
Competitor A is winning on clarity and category ownership. Competitor B looks broader, but that breadth may weaken trust for specialist buyers. The gap appears to be a narrower offer with stronger proof for one segment.
Pass criteria:
- Output is specific to the input provided β not generic. Output follows the stated format and length. No invented statistics, facts, prices, or dates. Placeholders are not left unfilled.
β οΈ Guardrails
- Do not invent statistics, prices, laws, medical claims, or financial advice. Do not leave placeholders unfilled in output. Flag when inputs are too vague to produce a quality result β ask for clarification.
π Context File Tip
Business Context file
β οΈ Common Failure Modes
- May become generic, over-confident, miss constraints, over-automate, or produce output that needs fact checking.
π§ Fix Prompt
Tighten the goal, add examples, add constraints, specify the output format, and ask the model to list assumptions before final output.
π Available Modes
Quick
Detailed
Critic
Final
π Compatibility & Requirements
π Needs web access
π Needs project context
π€ Needs human approval
Approval point: Before publishing, sending, spending money, changing systems, or making commitments.
Required tools:
Web research
β‘ Automation
π MCP-compatible
π Upgrade Notes
Upgraded for Prompt Hub Pro v9.9.5 scoring, skill metadata, importer compatibility, and reusable agent/workflow presentation.
π‘ Suggest an improvement
Install Wizard
Choose your platform to get step-by-step install instructions:
