CI/CD Pipeline Setup Guide
ChatGPTClaudeGemini⚠ Human review required🌐 Needs web access📁 Needs project context🔌 MCP-ready⚡ Automation-ready
Health
100/100
▲ 208
📋 1165 copies
Trigger Phrase
Run automation: CI/CD Pipeline Setup Guide
Prompt
306 words# AUTOMATION: CI/CD Pipeline Setup Guide
**Automation stage:** Automation-Ready — this workflow is designed for use with Make, n8n, Zapier, or MCP.
**Manual version:** Run each step manually first to confirm outputs before connecting automation.
---
## Trigger
**Phrase:** `Run automation: CI/CD Pipeline Setup Guide`
**Trigger type:** Manual / scheduled / webhook (configure in your automation tool)
## Input Schema
```
{
"context": "[describe what this automation receives as input]",
"goal": "[what a successful output looks like]",
"format": "[output format required by the next step or tool]"
}
```
## Core Prompt
You are a DevOps engineer.
Inputs:
- Application: [application]
- Tooling: [e.g. GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins]
Write a step-by-step setup: repo prep, build, test, deploy stages, environment variables/secrets handling, and a rollback procedure. Include complete, working config for the chosen tool with inline comments.
Constraints:
- Real, runnable config (no pseudo-YAML); explain each stage briefly.
- Handle secrets safely (never hard-code); note prerequisites.
- Structured: steps + config block.
Output: a guide with a ready-to-use pipeline file.
## Output Schema
```
{
"output": "[structured result]",
"status": "complete | needs_review | failed",
"issues": "[list any problems found — empty if none]",
"handoff": "[summary for the next step or tool]"
}
```
## Human Approval Checkpoint
⚠️ **Require human review before:**
- Sending to external recipients
- Publishing or posting publicly
- Making financial or legal decisions
- Updating production systems
## Error Handling
- If input is missing required fields: return `status: failed` with list of missing fields
- If output quality is uncertain: return `status: needs_review` with specific reason
- Do not guess missing inputs — fail cleanly with a clear message
## Platform Notes
- **Make / n8n:** Map input fields to the schema above. Add a human approval module before output delivery.
- **Zapier:** Use a Filter step to check `status === complete` before continuing the Zap.
- **MCP:** Register trigger phrase as a tool. Validate input schema before invoking.
**Automation stage:** Automation-Ready — this workflow is designed for use with Make, n8n, Zapier, or MCP.
**Manual version:** Run each step manually first to confirm outputs before connecting automation.
---
## Trigger
**Phrase:** `Run automation: CI/CD Pipeline Setup Guide`
**Trigger type:** Manual / scheduled / webhook (configure in your automation tool)
## Input Schema
```
{
"context": "[describe what this automation receives as input]",
"goal": "[what a successful output looks like]",
"format": "[output format required by the next step or tool]"
}
```
## Core Prompt
You are a DevOps engineer.
Inputs:
- Application: [application]
- Tooling: [e.g. GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins]
Write a step-by-step setup: repo prep, build, test, deploy stages, environment variables/secrets handling, and a rollback procedure. Include complete, working config for the chosen tool with inline comments.
Constraints:
- Real, runnable config (no pseudo-YAML); explain each stage briefly.
- Handle secrets safely (never hard-code); note prerequisites.
- Structured: steps + config block.
Output: a guide with a ready-to-use pipeline file.
## Output Schema
```
{
"output": "[structured result]",
"status": "complete | needs_review | failed",
"issues": "[list any problems found — empty if none]",
"handoff": "[summary for the next step or tool]"
}
```
## Human Approval Checkpoint
⚠️ **Require human review before:**
- Sending to external recipients
- Publishing or posting publicly
- Making financial or legal decisions
- Updating production systems
## Error Handling
- If input is missing required fields: return `status: failed` with list of missing fields
- If output quality is uncertain: return `status: needs_review` with specific reason
- Do not guess missing inputs — fail cleanly with a clear message
## Platform Notes
- **Make / n8n:** Map input fields to the schema above. Add a human approval module before output delivery.
- **Zapier:** Use a Filter step to check `status === complete` before continuing the Zap.
- **MCP:** Register trigger phrase as a tool. Validate input schema before invoking.
Before & After
❌ Without this prompt
Unstructured request with unclear constraints and inconsistent output.
✅ With this prompt
Reusable, testable prompt/skill with clear trigger, inputs, output format, guardrails, and pass criteria.
Install Instructions
Install the skill component first. Map the trigger phrase to your automation tool (Make, n8n, Zapier). Connect inputs and outputs as described. Set a human approval checkpoint before high-risk outputs. Test end-to-end before going live.
Test It
Test command:
Trigger manually with a test input. Confirm structured output matches the expected schema before connecting automation.
Expected output:
# .github/workflows/ci.yml
on: [push]
jobs: build: ... test: ... deploy: needs: test ...
Rollback: redeploy previous tag.
on: [push]
jobs: build: ... test: ... deploy: needs: test ...
Rollback: redeploy previous tag.
Pass criteria:
- Output is structured and machine-readable. Trigger phrase reliably produces the expected output format. Human approval point is clearly flagged before high-risk actions.
⚠️ Guardrails
- Do not execute high-risk actions without a human approval checkpoint. Output must be structured and predictable. Log or flag unexpected inputs rather than guessing. Do not invent statistics, prices, laws, medical claims, or financial advice. Do not leave placeholders unfilled in output. Flag when inputs are too vague to produce a quality result — ask for clarification.
📁 Context File Tip
Business Context file
⚠️ Common Failure Modes
- May become generic, over-confident, miss constraints, over-automate, or produce output that needs fact checking.
🔧 Fix Prompt
Tighten the goal, add examples, add constraints, specify the output format, and ask the model to list assumptions before final output.
🎛 Available Modes
Quick
Detailed
Critic
Final
🔌 Compatibility & Requirements
🌐 Needs web access
📎 Needs uploaded files
📁 Needs project context
👤 Needs human approval
Approval point: Before publishing, sending, spending money, changing systems, or making commitments.
Required tools:
Web researchFile analysisConnected appsAutomation builder
🔗 Connector required — check MCP or integration docs.
⚡ Automation
n8n
🔌 MCP-compatible
📋 Upgrade Notes
Upgraded for Prompt Hub Pro v9.9.5 scoring, skill metadata, importer compatibility, and reusable agent/workflow presentation.
💡 Suggest an improvement
Install Wizard
Choose your platform to get step-by-step install instructions:
