Write a 1500-word academic essay on [Insert Academic Topic] suitable for submission in a [Subject] undergraduate course. Requirements: 1) Use a natural human voice with varied sentence structure and tone, 2) Integrate cited sources (real or placeholder) sparingly and smoothly, 3) Avoid patterns common in AI writing (like perfect paragraph symmetry or generic transitions), 4) Focus on argument depth over verbosity. After the essay, add a 100-word critique assessing the human-likeness of the tone and identifying any red flags for AI-detection tools.
Useful prompt but the real issue is bigger? That usually means the workflow or team mechanism needs attention, not just the wording.
Forces the model to avoid rigid predictability and mimic real academic voice, then audits itself for βtellsβ that might trip AI detectors.
Despite centuries of Enlightenment philosophy, the concept of 'free will' remains philosophically fragile. Neuroscientific studies (Libet, 1985) challenge its empirical foundation...
Assessment: This essay avoids robotic symmetry and includes natural argumentative rhythm. Phrases like 'arguably' and 'still, many contend' add human tone. However, the neatness of transitions could hint at algorithmic structure.
Log in to suggest improvements.