Output Quality Evaluator (LLM-as-Judge)
Evaluate the following output [output text] for [criteria such as accuracy, clarity, relevance], and provide a score and reasoning.
Evaluate the following output [output text] for [criteria such as accuracy, clarity, relevance], and provide a score and reasoning.
Check if the retrieved documents [retrieved data] fully answer the query [query]. Flag missing or irrelevant information.
Evaluate the prompt [prompt text] for clarity, specificity, and bias. Suggest improvements in structure and content.
You are an engineering lead standardising code review. Input: – Language/framework: [language/framework] Write a code-review process: a review checklist (correctness, security, tests, readability), reviewer roles,…
You are an instructional-quality reviewer. Input: – Subject/grade: [subject/grade] Create an audit checklist scoring: 1) accuracy/relevance 2) engagement 3) inclusivity & accessibility 4) assessment alignment…